Menú

All

MBO or MBI

MBO and MBI: Which is the Best Option for Your Company?

In the world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), two common operations are MBOs (Management Buy-Outs) and MBIs (Management Buy-Ins). Although both involve the acquisition of a company by the management team, there are fundamental differences between the two figures. In this article, we will explore in detail what MBOs and MBIs are, their advantages and disadvantages, and how to determine which is the best option for your company.

What is an MBO (Management Buy-Out)?

An MBO (Management Buyout) is a process by which a company’s management team acquires all or a majority stake in the company. In essence, the managers become owners of the company they work for.

The management team that carries out the MBO is generally already working within the company and, therefore, has a deep understanding of its operations and potential.

MBOs are usually financed through a combination of the management team’s own resources and external financing, which may include debt (such as bank loans) or private equity investments.

The motivations for carrying out an MBO may include the desire of managers to have greater control over the company, the pursuit of a change in business strategy, or the opportunity to capitalize on the company’s market value.

The main objective of an MBO is to facilitate the transfer of ownership of the company to those who are already involved in its management, which is often seen as a way to better align the interests of management with those of the partners or shareholders.

A frequent example of an MBO is that of companies where the owner decides to retire and the management team proposes to acquire the company. If the proposal is accepted, the management team will seek financing to acquire the company’s shares or stock, thus becoming its new owners.

Managers, by becoming owners, have a greater incentive to drive the company’s growth and profitability. Furthermore, the management team already knows the company, its culture, its strengths and weaknesses, which facilitates the transition and strategic decision-making.

An MBO guarantees the continuity of the company and minimizes disruptions in daily operations. As there are no drastic changes in management, the transition is usually smoother and less disruptive for employees and customers.

However, an MBO also has drawbacks, among which is the need for external financing, as this can limit the ability of managers to make independent decisions and can generate pressure to obtain short-term results. Also, in some cases, there may be conflicts of interest between the manager-owners and other shareholders or stakeholders.

Another disadvantage of MBOs is the resistance to change that can occur as a result of the management team’s familiarity with the company, as this can make it difficult to implement radical changes or innovations.

Finally, it should be noted that the valuation of the company can be a point of friction between the managers and the sellers, especially if there are discrepancies about the future potential of the company.

What is an MBI (Management Buy-In)?

An MBI (Management Buy-In) is a process by which an external management team acquires a majority stake or the entirety of a company, generally with the objective of improving its management and performance. Unlike an MBO, the managers are not part of the company before the acquisition, they do not hold positions in the company that is going to be acquired, but they are usually professionals with experience in the industry or in business management of the relevant sector who are looking to invest in and manage a new company.

As in an MBO, an MBI can be financed through a combination of the new managers’ own capital, bank loans, and sometimes private equity investment.

The motivations for an MBI may include the search for investment opportunities, the desire to bring new ideas and management approaches to the company, or the desire to obtain a significant financial return from improving the company.

The main objective of an MBI is to revitalize or restructure a company that may be experiencing financial difficulties or that has untapped growth potential. The new managers seek to implement strategic and operational changes to improve profitability.

A common example in MBI operations is that of a group of managers from a competing company who see an opportunity in a company that is not performing adequately. After conducting an evaluation, they decide to acquire the company, contributing their experience and knowledge in the industry to implement changes and improve the financial situation of the company.

Among the advantages of an MBI are the potential new perspectives for the business, as an external management team can bring a fresh vision and new ideas that can drive the company’s growth and profitability.

External managers usually have extensive experience in business management and can contribute specialized knowledge and best practices. Also, external managers may have access to networks and contacts that can benefit the company in terms of business development and access to new markets.

An MBI can be a suitable option when a company needs restructuring or a significant change of direction.

MBIs also have drawbacks, as the external management team will need time to familiarize themselves with the company, its culture, and its operations, which can slow down decision-making and the implementation of changes. Also, employees may resist changes introduced by an external management team, which can create tensions and affect morale. Integrating the new management team into the company can be a challenge, especially if there are cultural or management style differences.

Finally, it should be noted that the costs associated with an MBI may be higher than in an MBO, due to the need to conduct thorough due diligence.

How to Choose Between MBO and MBI?

The choice between an MBO and an MBI depends on several factors, such as the company’s situation, the existing management team, the owners’ objectives, or the financing needs.

If the company is performing well and only needs a change of ownership, an MBO may be the best option. If the company needs restructuring or a change of direction, an MBI may be more suitable.

On the other hand, if the current management team is competent and committed to the company, an MBO may be a good option. On the contrary, if the management team needs to be renewed or strengthened, an MBI may be more beneficial.

In case the owners are looking for a smooth transition and to guarantee the continuity of the company, an MBO may be the best option; however, if they are looking to maximize the value of the company and are open to significant changes, an MBI may be more attractive.

The availability of financing and the conditions offered by investors can also influence the choice between MBO and MBI.

Both MBO and MBI are valid options for the acquisition of a company by a management team. The choice between them depends on the specific circumstances of the company, the objectives of the owners, and the characteristics of the management team.

It is essential to have the advice of legal and financial experts to carefully evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each option and make the most appropriate decision for the future of the company.

If you are considering an MBO or MBI for your company, do not hesitate to contact us. At ILP ABOGADOS, we have a team of M&A experts who will provide you with the advice and guidance necessary to carry out a successful operation.

If you liked this article, you may also find it interesting to read the following one:

Build-up or Carve-out? Key Considerations for Choosing the Best Business Growth Strategy

Contacto No te quedes con la duda, contacta con nosotros. Estaremos encantados de atenderte y ofrecerte soluciones.